Friday, October 12, 2012

VP Debate: A Review

VP debate at Centre College in Danville, Kentucky:

So Joe Biden and Paul Ryan had their debate last night.  Generally speaking, the VP debate has virtually no impact on the outcome of elections.  They usually are just a drumbeat of what the top of the ticket pushes in their own debates.  What you do have the opportunity to get is a feel for the intellect and temperament of the potential presidents, poised to assume power should the unfortunate happen to the man on the throne.  So how did the evening go?

Joe Biden’s job in this debate was primarily to energize the base of the Democratic party, who are still fuming over Obama’s abject failure to project a pulse in the first presidential debate.  The party was offended by the failure, and Biden was the punch back, and Biden was happy to comply.  He was aggressive, commanding, and did his best to keep Ryan on his heels.  He did tell some whoppers, particularly about the terrorist attack in Libya.  Not sure Biden paid much attention to the news of the day before the debate, because the State Department flatly contradicted everything he claimed last night.  Someone should have told him, because anyone who knew of the SD statements watched the lie snowball with every sentence.  The White House had to execute the requisite spin and roll it back after the debate, saying that Biden was only referring to himself and Obama, not the administration.  But he also was shockingly rude, unprofessional and condescending – not something I expected, even with Biden’s propensity for running his mouth without using his brain.  I thought Biden would be what made the debate fun to watch, but I found myself more put off and offended the longer the debate went on.  The non-stop interruptions, the condescending laughter while shaking his head, the retorts that flirted with being obnoxiously loud, all of it made Biden look unprofessional.  And that may have backfired for him, as independents and women tend to despise that exact attitude.  It’s fortunate that the VP debate has little impact on the election.  That said, Biden was successful in accomplishing his goal, which was energizing the base.  No tangible impact will come of it, but he did what was expected.  Grade:  B+

Paul Ryan is clearly the novice in these circumstances and, as such, Biden did his best to smack him around.  Ryan never got flustered, he was even tempered and measured, even when Biden was overpowering him and talking over him loudly.  He seemed to consciously restrain himself a few times, when it appeared he was going to run over Biden for interrupting him AGAIN.  But he kept his cool, and just plugged along.  He was at a distinct disadvantage, with the moderator Radditz interrupting him as well, and allowing Biden free reign in his treatment of Ryan.  As for his substance, I will say I was pleasantly surprised at Ryans’s competence on military issues and foreign affairs.  His specialty is economics, finance and taxation, so a deft touch with foreign affairs is a definite plus for Romney.  But he still wouldn’t give specifics in his economic plan, and that’s been a sticking point with independents.  I don’t think it hurt him, but it didn’t help.  In general he did a good job, and he was respectful of everyone, which is more than can be said for Biden.  Grade:  A

Martha Radditz is ABC's Chief Foreign Correspondent for the State Department, who specializes on national security and foreign affairs, who spends most of her time overseas with the military.  Her moderation was appropriate, being that she probably knows more about foreign affairs than Biden and Ryan combined.  I  laud her ability to keep the debate moving along, something Jim Lehrer had difficulty accomplishing.   But she is very liberal, and she appeared to favor Biden most of the night.  She did nothing to stop Biden from belittling and interrupting Ryan, never even trying to quiet him down when he was overly loud with his interjections.  She also interrupted Ryan herself several times, demanding a specificity she never demanded of Biden.  And with her foreign affairs acumen, she mostly focused on her specialty, the Middle East.  She never talked China or Latin America, and only tapped domestic policy sparingly, covering Medicare and Social Security under the same topical segment.  It was generally hit and miss with her.  Overall she was okay, but she will never moderate another debate.  Republicans were angry with her tactics and free reign allowed to Biden’s behavior, so she’ll likely never get approval from the GOP to moderate again.  Grade:   B-

The debate was mostly a wash.  I graded Ryan a little higher than Biden, mostly on attitude grounds, but I give a sliver of an edge to Biden as the winner - barely.  The simple fact is that, while Biden's behavior was poor, Democrats wanted to see some fight in their candidates.  Biden went overboard, but he did what they wanted, making his night a success.  Ryan had nothing to really gain, but plenty to lose on Romney's success last week.  He really just needed to maintain, and he did that very well.

The next presidential debate is October 16, 2012 at Hofstra University in New York.

No comments:

Post a Comment